![¡½¬ü°êÁnºÙ¬£¥X¡u¥dº¸¤å´Ë¡v¸¹®Ö°Ê¤O¯è¥À¾Ô°«¸s«e©¹´ÂÂA¥b®q®ü°ì¡C¸ê®Æ¹Ï¤ù](http://image.wenweipo.com/2017/04/24/a24a.jpg)
¡½Jeffrey Tse [ywc_jeffrey@hotmail.com]
ì¤å
°ê®a¥D®u²ßªñ¥4¤ë12¤é¦P¬ü°êÁ`²Î¯S®Ô´¶³q¹q¸Ü¡A¨â°ê¤¸º´N´ÂÂA¥b®q§½¶Õµ¥¦@¦PÃö¤ßªº°ÝÃD¥æ´«¤F·N¨£¡C¤¤¤è°í«ù¥H¹ï¸Ü¤è¦¡©M¥¸Ñ¨M°ÝÃD¡]peaceful resolution¡^¡A¦Ó¬ü¤èªñ¤é¬ðµM«Å§G¬£¥X¤F¯è¥À¸s¡]aircraft carrier strike group ¡^¾p¦V´ÂÂA¥b®q®ü°ì¡A¥O¦a°Ï§½¶ÕÆJµMºò±i¡C
²ßªñ¥4¤ëªì³X¬ü»P¯S®Ô´¶¦b®ü´ò²ø¶é·|±¡A´N·í«e¤¤¬üÃö«Y¶i¦æ²`¤J·¾³q¡A¨ú±o¤£¤Ö¦@ÃÑ¡]consensus¡^¡A¦ý²ßªñ¥Â÷¶}¬ü°ê²Ý¤é¡A¬ü°êªí¥Ü¡u¥dº¸¤å´Ë¡v¸¹®Ö°Ê¤O¯è¥À¾Ô°«¸s§ïÅÜì©w¾p©¹¿D¤j§Q¨Èªºp¹º¡]scrapped its original plan¡^¡A¶}¦V´ÂÂA¥b®q®ü°ì¡C
±µþÓ¡A¯S®Ô´¶¦bªÀ¥æºô¯¸Twitter¤WÁnºÙ¡A¥L´¿¦V²ßªñ¥©ú¨¥¡AY¤¤°ê¦¨¥\¸Ñ¨M´ÂÂA°ÝÃD¡A±N¥i¥H±o¨ì§ó¦nªº¶T©ö¨óij¡]trade deal¡^¡FY±o¤£¨ì¤¤°ê¨ó§U¡A¬ü°ê±N·|¿W¦Û¸Ñ¨M°ÝÃD¡C
¤¤¬ü«O«ù·¾³q¨ó½Õ
©M¥¸Ñ¨M´Â®Ö°ÝÃD¬O¤¤°êªº¤@³e¥ß³õ¡]official stance¡^¡C²ßªñ¥»P¯S®Ô´¶³q¸Ü®É«¥Ó¡A¤¤¤è°í«ù¹ê²{¥b®qµL®Ö¤Æ¡]denuclearisation¡^¥Ø¼Ð¡A°í«ùºûÅ@¥b®q©M¥»Péw¡]stability¡^¡A¥D±i³q¹L©M¥¤è¦¡¸Ñ¨M°ÝÃD¡AÄ@¦P¬ü¤è´N¥b®q°ÝÃD«O«ù·¾³q©M¨ó½Õ¡C
¤¤°ê¤£§Æ±æ¡B¤]¤£µªÀ³´ÂÂA¥b®q¾Ô¤õ«¿U¡A²ßªñ¥°í«ù¤£¾Ó¦a¡]steadfastly¡^ªí¹F¤¤¤èªº©ú½T¥ß³õ¡A´N¬O´£¿ô¬ü¤è¡A¸Ñ¨M´Â®Ö°ÝÃD¡A¤£¯à¾a¤É·Å¡]tension-mongering¡^¡C
©Ú«ÂÀ~§Q»¤ªZ¤O¤¶¤J
¦Ü©ó§â´Â®Ö»P¤¤¬ü¶T©ö¡]Sino-US trade¡^³o¨âÓ¿W¥ß°ÝÃDµw§è¤WÃö«Y¡An¨D¤¤°ê¹ï´Â¬IÀ£¡A¥H´«¨ú§ó¦nªº¤¤¬ü¶T©ö¨óij¡A³o¬O¨ª»r»rªº¬Fªv³_¶B¡]blatant extortion¡^¡C
¤¤°êªÃ«ù¬Û¤¬´L«¡B¥µ¥¬Û«Ýªº¥~¥æì«h¡]diplomatic principle¡^¡A¤¤°ê§Æ±æ´ÂÂA¥b®q©M¥Ã©w¡A¦ý¤£·|¤]¤£¥i¯à¬°¤Fº¡¨¬¬ü°êªºn¨D¡A¦Ó¥H±jÅv¦V´ÂÂA¬IÀ£¡B¢¨ä§CÀY¡C
´ÂÂA¥b®q©M´Â®Ö°ÝÃD¥Ñ¨Ó¤w¤[¡A¬J¦³¾ú¥v®¦«è¡]old grudges¡^¡A§ó»P¦U¤è¨¤¤O¦³Ãö¡A²o¯A¨ì¤¤¬ü«X´ÂÁú¤é¤»¤è¿ùºî½ÆÂøªºÃö«Y¡]complex power play¡^¡C¨Æ¹ê¤W¡A¤¤°ê¬°©M¥¸Ñ¨M´Â®Ö°ÝÃD§@¥X¤F¥¨¤j°^Äm¡A§êºt¤F«n¨¤¦â¡C
¾ú¥vªº±Ð°VÃÒ©ú¡A¥~¤O¤¶¤J¥u·|¥[¼@´ÂÂA¥b®qªº§½¶Õºò±i¡C¦pªG´ÂÂA¥b®q°ÝÃD´c¤Æ¡A³Ì²×¾ÉP±¡ªp¤£¨ü±±¡]get out of hand¡^¬Æ¦Ü§L¦¥¬Û¨£¡A¦U¤è³£Ãø§K±²¤J¨ä¤¤¡A²_¬°¨ü®`ªÌ¡C
§Æ±æ¬ü°ê§l¨ú¾ú¥v±Ð°V¡A¿n·¥ÅTÀ³¡]actively respond¡^¤¤¤è¥H¹ï¸Ü¸Ñ¨M¥Ù¬Þªº©IÆ~¡A³o¤~³Ì²Å¦X´ÂÂA¥b®q°ÝÃD¦U¤èªº§Q¯q¡C
¡]¼ÐÃD¤Î¤p¼ÐÃD¬°½s¿è©Ò¥[¡^
¡]ºK¿ý¦Û¤å¶×³øªÀµû13-4-2017¡^
Learning Point
´ÂÂA¥b®q§½¶Õ¦«e«æ³t¤É·Å¡A¬ü°ê¥Õ®c´¿«Å§G¬£»º¤F¡u¥dº¸¤å´Ë¡v¸¹¯è¥À¾Ô°«¸s¾p¦V´ÂÂA¥b®q¤ô°ì¡C
µM¦Ó¡A¡u¥dº¸¤å´Ë¡v¸¹³Q´¦·í®É®Ú¥»ÁÙ¥¼¥Xµo¡CÁú°ê¡m¤¤¥¡¤é³ø¡n¤é«e¥H¡u¯S®Ô´¶ªº¥dº¸¤å´ËÁÀ¨¥¡v¬°¼ÐÃD¡A§åµû¬ü°ê¥u·|¡u¾aÀ~¡v¡A¥OÁú°ê¤H¨üÄF¡C
¥Õ®cµo¨¥¤H´µ¬£¶ë¼á²M«ü¡A¯S®Ô´¶»¡¹L·|¬£¥XÄ¥¶¤¡A¡u³o¬O¨Æ¹ê¡AÄ¥¶¤²{¥¿¾p¦V´ÂÂA¡C¡v
Áú°ê¡m¤¤¥¡¤é³ø¡n³ø¹D¡A´ÂÂA¦b¾\§L»ö¦¡¤¤®i¥Ü¾É¼u¡A¸Õ¹Ï¾_Äà¥~¬É¡A½èºÃ¬ü°ê¤]±Ä¨ú¤@¼Ëªº¡u¾aÀ~¡vµ¦²¤¡C
Áú°ê©M¤é¥»§¡¬O¬ü°ê¦b¨È¬wªº«n·ù¤Í¡A¤ÀªR»{¬°¡AÁú¤é¨â°ê¨S¥i¯à¤£ª¾¹D¡u¥dº¸¤å´Ë¡v¸¹©|¥¼°_¦æ¡A¦ý¨â°ê¬F©²³£¨S¦³¼á²M¡A¹ê»Ú¤W¬O»P¬ü°ê¦X§@¡A¤Ï¬M¨â°ê¨ü¨ì»P¬ü¤èªºÁp·ù§ô¿£¡C
¦³±M®a«ü¡AÁú¤é¬F©²³¬¤f¤£¨¥¡A¦³§U¡u°²·s»D¡vÄ~Äòµo»Ã¡A¼W¥[¹ï´ÂÂAªºÀ£¤O¡C
Ķ¤å
Chinese President Xi Jin-ping shared his views on the situation in North Korea with US President Donald Trump in a telephone call on April 12. While China called for a peaceful resolution, the US stoked tensions as an aircraft carrier strike group was sent towards the Korean coast.
Trump offers better trade deals for China's support
During their meeting at the Mar-a-Lago estate early April, Xi and Trump reached important consensus as they engage in discussions on various issues regarding bilateral ties. However, a US navy strike group led by aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson scrapped its original plan of heading to Australia, and churned towards the Korean peninsula the next day Xi left.
Trump then followed up on Twitter, claiming he had told Xi that China would get a better trade deal if they "solve the North Korean problem", and if China was not going to help, the US would "solve the problem without them".
Solving the North Korean nuclear crisis through peaceful means has always been China's official stance. Xi has also reiterated during the phone call with Trump that China will continue to maintain peace and stability in the Korean peninsula, and are willing to work with the US in order to reach the denuclearisation of the region.
China declines such extortion
China does not wish, and would not agree to let the Korean War resume. By steadfastly asserting China's position, President Xi was reminding his US counterpart that tension-mongering are not the solution to the nuclear threat.
Also, linking Sino-US trade with the North Korean issue for leverage over China is nothing but blatant extortion.
On the one hand, China upholds the diplomatic principle of mutual respect and equality, and hopes for peace and stability in the Korean peninsula. But on the other hand, she will not press North Korea to back down just to fulfil the requests of Trump.
The North Korean nuclear problem has been a long standing issue involving old grudges and complex power play between China, the US, Russia, North Korea, the Republic of Korea and Japan. In fact, China has already played an important role and contributed greatly to a peaceful settlement. History has taught us that the involvement of external parties would only lead to increased tensions. No one would benefit if things get out of hand and war breaks out in the Korean peninsula.
Let's hope that the United States will learn from the lessons of history, and actively respond to the Chinese call for a peaceful resolution, for it would be in the best interests for all parties involved.